Saturday, August 11, 2007

Just for Fun: Smoke Bombs

If you're like me, you need a little diversion every once in a while. Honestly, reporting on the anti-rights crowds never ceasing attempts to deprive me of my Constitutionally guaranteed rights can get a bit tiring. I know this has little to do with guns or gun rights, but I hope you enjoy it just the same.

DISCLAIMER: Neither I, nor anyone associated with "The Real Gun Guys" accept any responsibility for what you choose to do with the information presented below.

In other words, you're on your own.


That said, the procedures presented are perfectly safe and have worked just fine for me in the past. While there are other methods, this is the one that I use and it works just fine for me.

Smoke Bombs have many uses, concealment, pranks, diversions, celebrating the birth of our nation, signaling for help, or just plain fun. The term "Smoke Bomb" is a misnomer, as this device doesn't explode, it merely burns fast and hot. However, I wouldn't confine one. That's never a good idea.

Don't let the following procedure intimidate you. If you can make caramels, you can make smoke bombs.

The recipe for a simple smoke bomb is as follows:

6 parts potassium nitrate (fine white granules)
4 parts sugar (granulated)

Additional:

1 cleaned and dried standard sized soup can.

Optional:

6" length of cannon fuse

Potassium nitrate (Salt Peter) can be found at Wal-Mart as Spectracide Stump Remover for $5 a pound. Don't get the Green Light Stump Remover, it's not potassium nitrate. Sugar is of course available almost anywhere for next to nothing.

Usually formula ingredients are measured by weight (Black Powder is for example), but I measure my ingredients for this formula by volume and have had good results. Today, we're going to make a soup can sized smoke bomb.

Construction:

Take 9 oz by volume of potassium nitrate and 6 oz of granulated table sugar and mix them together completely. At this point you could just stick in a fuse and light it, and it'd work just fine, but you will get better results if you keep going.

Take a small stainless steel kettle and put it on the stove. Set the burner to medium and put in your potassium nitrate and sugar mixture. Stir occasionally with a spoon and be patient, do not turn up the heat to try and hurry it up. After a while the mixture will begin to stick to the bottom of the pan. Keep stirring every three of four minutes until the mixture melts and looks like runny peanut butter. That's the sugar caramelizing. You can go a little further if you want, but there's little need. At this point you could mix in powdered dyes to change the color of the smoke, but we're not going to do this. This formula produces white smoke.

BE CAREFUL - THIS MIXTURE IS EXTREMELY HOT!

Take you're cleaned and de-labeled soup can and pour your melted mixture into it. Use potholders as the can will be very hot! Set the can someplace out of the way where it can sit undisturbed. The mixture may bubble up a bit and foam over, as it is still cooking in the middle. When it has cooled, but still pliable, insert your fuse (if you have it) in the middle and secure it with the cooled mixture. Let sit more until it has fully cooled and then store if an airtight container (I use Ziplock plastic bags) as the cooled mixture is very hygroscopic.

Use:

This formula ignites easily and all that is really required is a match or lighter, but a fuse makes it more convenient. Place the smoke bomb in an area away from any combustibles and light the fuse. Get back at least ten feet. If lighting without a fuse, do so very carefully.

The smoke bomb will burn fast and hot, while hissing loudly the whole time. It also produces a prodigious amount of smoke. I suggest you not light off a smoke bomb this big in a residential area unless you want the fire department to show up. A smaller, golf ball sized smoke bomb made from the same formulation will be more than adequate. All you would have to do then is pour out the melted mixture onto a greased flat baking pan and when it cools sufficiently, form it into little balls. You could also put the fuses in them at the same time.

How it works:

I'm no chemist (and if you are one, you're probably going to cringe at my explanation. Feel free to write me at the address on the left and I'll correct anything I got wrong.), but basically it works like this. The potassium nitrate is an oxidizer and provides the oxygen, and the sugar is the fuel. When mixed in the proper proportions, the sugar burns completely leaving little ash. Sugar will burn just fine on it's own, but it's slow and dirty. Mixed in a dry mixture with the potassium nitrate, it burns better, but still leaves a lot of hot, sooty ash. When cooked together the potassium nitrate is more completely and closely bonded with the sugar and thus it burns significantly better. A golf ball sized smoke bomb will only leave a round scorched mark on the pavement.

In closing, have fun and be safe. Feel free to leave me feedback or questions about this post at the address on the left.

-Yuri

Good Luck With That...

From the "Odd Searches" file:

Notice the country of origin and terms searched with...

Let me know how that works out for ya.

Where Discretionary CCW Permitting Gets You

FBI reportedly probes gun permits
Suit alleges ex-Sheriff Blanas issued licenses for concealed weapons as political favors.
By Christina Jewett - Bee Staff Writer

The FBI is looking into concealed-gun permits issued by the Sacramento County Sheriff's Department, according to documents filed in a lawsuit that alleges former Sheriff Lou Blanas issued permits as political favors.

Documents filed Friday in the federal civil rights suit say FBI investigators have requested gun permit documents from the department, which include a permit Blanas issued to Sacramento businessman Edwin G. Gerber. Gerber gave $3,500 to Blanas' election campaign, election records show, and bought a vacation home with Blanas in Reno in the fall of 2005, according to property records.

The former sheriff signed Gerber's gun permit a day before leaving office last summer. He issued the approval without following the department's usual procedure, which calls for a three-person committee to review applications from people asking to carry a loaded gun in public, according to interviews and court documents.

FBI spokesman Steven Dupre declined to say whether an investigation was taking place.

Sacramento County Sheriff John McGinness said he could not comment on any possible FBI review.

Law enforcement sources said the FBI did request information from the department's concealed-weapons permit division. But those sources said they had no knowledge of whether Gerber's application was included in that request.

Blanas and Gerber did not return repeated calls from The Bee.

State law says sheriffs and police chiefs can award concealed-weapon permits based on "good cause" to people of "good moral character."

The Sacramento County Sheriff's Department sets the bar higher. Applicants typically are interviewed by a deputy and required to take a gun safety class in addition to facing the review panel.

McGinness said the permit approval committee was put in place more than a decade ago to keep the elected sheriff from deciding who gets the permits and giving the appearance of political motivation.

He said the system has worked generally well, but here, as in many counties, it is a "nebulous" endeavor that he'd like to see better organized.

McGinness said Gerber's application was for an "emergency permit" that should have lasted 90 days -- instead of the two years of most permits.

Gerber said in his application that he carried "large sums of cash" and wore expensive jewelry.

The department revoked Gerber's permit in December -- five months after it was issued, McGinniss said.

Attorney John Lavra, who works for a private firm that contracts with the county, represents Blanas and the county in the civil rights suit. He would not comment specifically on Gerber's permit, saying only that all permits are issued for good reason.

About 250 civilians hold gun-carry permits issued by the Sacramento County Sheriff's Department, officials said. While it is legal to have a gun in one's house or business, it is a crime to walk around with a loaded gun without a permit.

The lawsuit, filed in December 2003 when Blanas was sheriff, alleges that Blanas denied David Mehl, a chemical engineer, and Lok T. Lau, a retired FBI agent, equal protection under the law when his office turned down their applications for gun-carry permits.

"It's about political influence, power and money," said their attorney Gary Gorski. "Anyone who gives money to the sheriff and applies for a (permit), gets a (permit). There are a lot of people who apply for one and need one but don't get one."

Lavra said both men were denied permits for good cause and in accordance with long-standing policy.

"We believe that the undisputed evidence in the case will show that each were denied a (weapon) license based upon legal and legitimate and sound reasons," Lavra said.

On Friday, Gorski filed documents claiming Blanas' attorneys have been withholding evidence in the federal case.

U.S. Magistrate Judge Kimberly Mueller ruled Monday that Gorski and Blanas' attorneys should try to work out their disagreement before an Aug. 22 hearing about the evidence.

In the paperwork filed Friday, Gorski says a Sheriff's Department clerk told him during a sworn deposition that the FBI was investigating gun-carry permits. That includes Gerber's hand-scrawled application, Gorski said.

The application contains only a brief explanation for why Gerber was seeking to carry a loaded gun: "Carry large sums of cash $4,000-$5,000. Wear $45,000 watch & rings -- expensive jewelry."

On the cover sheet, the word "approved" is checked, and the comments line says simply: "Approved by Sheriff Blanas," with his signature.

McGinness said Gerber's permit was revoked in December when officials noted that the 90-day period had passed and that Gerber had not provided proof of completing a gun safety class.

On Dec. 19, Gerber sent a letter to the department stating that when he applied for the permit, he told Blanas he had been assaulted three times in Sacramento restaurants and bars, increasing his need for protection. Gerber had not included that information in his application or filed police reports, McGinness said.

In May -- five months after the department had pulled Gerber's permit -- Blanas called and suggested the new sheriff revoke the permit because the threat against Gerber no longer existed, McGinness said.

Gorski said hundreds of applicants with more compelling needs to carry a gun have been rejected over the years. His filings allege that six major Blanas contributors were issued weapon permits, as well as several business associates of Blanas and his wife.

According to campaign finance filings, Gerber's company, Energetic Paint & Drywall Inc., gave $1,500 to Blanas in August 2003, part of a $3,500 contribution during the election cycle.

Two years later, Gerber, Blanas and his wife, Nanette Blanas, took out a $518,000 loan together for a house worth $647,000 in Reno, records from the Washoe County assessor and recorder show.

Elections records show that Gerber made two $5,000 contributions to McGinness in August 2006. McGinness returned both, records show.

"That was money I didn't need, so I gave it back," he said.

McGinness said he has assigned new captains and chiefs to the permit-review panel. He said he plans to change the system, making it computer-based and standardized. He said he will have veto power over permits awarded from now on.

All Points Bulletin!

Be on the look out for the following:



Thanks to Blogonomicon!
Direct .PDF download.

Friday, August 10, 2007

The Truth About AK-47 Firepower



Thanks to The Firearms Coalition for the video.

Video Interview: Ryan Horsley of Red's Trading Post



Part 1
Ryan Horsley on the history of Red’s Trading Post



Part 2
The Growth of Red’s Trading Post



Part 3
Ryan Horsley on dealing with the ATF



Part 4
Ryan Horsley on the 2nd Amendment



Bonus Video!

Red's Trading Post - Commercial #1



Red's Trading Post - Commercial #1



It's that time of year again...

Fathers Create Bulletproof Backpacks

It's time for parents to make the annual trek to get back to school items, which usually includes jeans, jerseys and a few notebooks.

NewsCenter 5's Pam Cross reported Thursday that a couple of North Shore men want parents to consider something else -- a bulletproof backpack.

"They have them with them on the floor, on their laps, on the bus. They always have a backpack," said Joe Curran, of My Child's Pack.
It started with the Columbine shooting in 1999. Curran and Mike Pelonzi said that they watched and worried for their own children. They had the idea to hide bulletproof material inside a backpack. They call it defensive action.

"If the kid has a backpack next to them, or under the desk, they can pick it up, the straps act as a handle and it becomes a shield," Curran said.

It's much lighter than a 15-pound police vest. After three years of experimenting, the backpacks that were tested by an outside lab ranked threat level two. It stops an assortment of bullets, including 9-millimeter hollow point bullets. The fathers researched school shootings from 1900 to this year.

They will sell for $175, but do the special book bags play upon paranoia when most schools are called safe?"

I want to keep my kid safe. I don't care what you do -- if you want to fight the good fight or fix the world's hurts, I can't help you, but my kids are going to be safe because of these backpacks," Curran said.

(How about ensuring those responsible for protecting your kids are actually able to protect them? -Yuri)